Other posts related to road-safety

Why do some hate Lycra?

Aushiker | February 26, 2010 1:23 pm

An interesting letter written by Geoff Owen of Wembley was published in the Post, February 27, 2010 questioning the apparent hatred of “Lycra wearing” cyclists, or more correctly the use of the word “Lycra” to demean a group of people.  I thought Mr Owen’s letter was constructive so I penned the following reply which I have sent into the The Post.

Dear Editor

I would like to comment in support of the views expressed by Geoff Owen, "Ah, the simple joys of wearing lycra" published in the Post, February 27, 2010.

I also wonder about the "hatred" that seems to be held against a fabric with the brand name of Lycra, a fabric by the way not generally used in cycling clothing (well none of my jerseys contain it) and my research suggests it is not used in cycling clothing at all; rather it is more common in underwear and female swimsuits. Maybe these letter writers are getting flustered by lovely ladies at the beach wearing Lycra (or spandex)?

Humour aside I think we forget that cyclists are legitimate users of the road, that they are people, mums and dads, brothers and sisters, sons and daughters and they are out there commuting, riding for recreation, carrying out errands and so on, all in a healthily and environmentally friendly manner, whilst taking another car off the road and reducing the congestion and environmental impact for all users.

Sure some cyclists break the law and do stupid things, but gee whiz, has any of these Lycra "haters" not done the same? More so, have they not done the same whilst behind the wheel of a car or truck? Which is really worst? The cyclist doing something stupid or the motorist?

I ask those Lycra "haters" a simple question? How many cyclists killed or injured a pedestrian or motorist or vehicle passenger in 2009? How many motorists killed or seriously injured a pedestrian or a motorist or other vehicle occupant in 2009?  What is the worst a cyclist can do you to you? Scratch your car’s paint? What is the worst you can do to them? Kill them; destroy their families, leave children without a mum or dad. Which is worse? Where should your anger and cries for change for the better be really directed?

You know the next set of traffic lights is likely to hold you up more than myself on my bicycle (oh my god, in my cycling clothes too) and if you are getting that frustrated, maybe you need to take up walking or cycling and chill out. All that pent up frustration can’t be good for you. I know that I now drive better since taking up cycling and I drive with a much more relaxed frame of mind … maybe you could try it?

So please lets get along and share the road together and respectfully. Can it be that hard?

Kindest regards

Bookmark and Share

Popularity: 3% [?]

Letter to the Editor – Cycling and Dying

Aushiker | February 18, 2010 8:15 pm

Uncle Arthur posted this letter at the Australian Cycling Forums . He sent this letter to the Courier Mail, and specifically Mr Paul Syvret assistant editor and columnist at the Courier Mail, who it seems has used the Courier Mail recently to do all he can to reinvigorate the I Hate Cyclists world. Uncle Arthur indicates that is a direct response to recent articles, and to the tragic incident in Brisbane this week.  Uncle Arthur asked that it be shared around and I am happy to post it here as a thought provoking piece.

Dear Mr Syvret,

It seems you thrive on sensensationalism – sitting comfortably behind your desk in your office, it must seem a wonderful place to espouse your views of the world, and it was with interest, and disdain, that over the last couple of weeks that I saw the Courier Mail launch attack after attack at Brisbane’s cyclists. Now from the relative safety of my desk – a far more safe place than the roads I ride in this city, let me share my thoughts with you.

It was a shame to see that after pages of vitriol, the CM couldn’t see fit to publish even a minor comment on the tragic cyclist death this week. Personally, the news of that death gave me shivers, and it has spread like wild fire across Brisbane’s very close knit and growing cyclist community. Just so you can get some perspective on what that death means to a cyclist, I offer you the following perspective – a sort of ‘opinion piece’ you might call it.

Riding down that slight hill, the mystery cyclist would have been feeling pretty good. Perhaps a bit of a sea breeze coming off the Bay to provide a bit of headwind, but rolling downhill always takes the strain off. Clicking down through the gears, the light ahead was green – and going with the flow of traffic, you can let the wariness drop for a second – head up, pedals down, pushing through the gears to wind up some speed – 35kmh, 40kmh, 45kmh – the pedal stroke a steady cadence now.

He would have looked up, and saw the truck, “He’s slowing?” – a half question, half statement said to himself in his mind, catching the driver’s eye for a second – “that’s a nod? He’s seen me?” again those thoughts, half question, half statement. “Yes – he’s slowi…….. OH s*** NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO! NO NO OH PLEASE GOD NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” Fingers grasping at the brake levers – it’s almost impossible to slow a road bicycle in time. And then the sickening THUD! and nothing but pain.

The truck driver may have never even seen him – what’s a Give Way sign anyway? It’s not like it means STOP, as the truck driver maintained his momentum through the intersection to hit the main road at speed. He may have never noticed the cyclist, never heard him scream, never heard the noise as the cyclist hit the front of the truck – no doubt it is hard to hear those things with the big diesel engine rumbling away beneath the seat, and hard to see what’s in the blind spot immediately in front of the truck when he’s sitting so high.

All your muscles tense when you know you’re about to be hit by a car on the bike. Your body goes into super protective mode, and all you can do is brace for the impact you know is coming. The cyclist may have been unconscious a moment after the truck hit him, or, in a blinding, rising panic of fear and pain, he may have been completely aware of what was happening as he started to go under those huge steel wheels – fingers clambering for any kind of hold to prevent his fall, his legs dangling perilously close to the road, gravity, panic, and pain all taking over. He might have been completely unaware of being dragged some 30 metres along Wynnum Road under the front of that truck, or he could have been completely aware of being trapped between the unyielding metal of the front axle, and the cheese grater surface of the bitumen – either way, lycra and a lightweight helmet offers little protection for vulnerable skin and bone. It must have been a horrifying final few seconds for that cyclist, all because a motorist, safely ensconced in their vehicle, didn’t give way – what we do know for sure is that, quoting the other news reports, “he died at the scene.”

As a road cyclist, this is our reality. Having been almost run down by a Council bus, I know that fear, that panic, and the sensation of being so close to death that you can taste it. I was within 30 cm of going under the rear wheels, all because the driver thought he deserved to be on the road more than me. I still don’t know to this day how I managed to keep the bike upright.

I ride for pleasure, for the social aspect, for exercise, and as a triathlete, I ride to train. There are no facilities in this city that allow me to ride in the same environment as when I race – the road, where I am legally entitled to be is that place. Every morning that I head out for my ride, I kiss my wife good bye as she lies in bed, answering her plea of “ride safe” with a stoic “I will”, openly wondering in the back of my mind if this will be the morning when I ride home in an ambulance, or worse, never walk, never ride again, never come home. The relief in her voice when I phone her upon my safe return is tangible, as is the panic she has expressed on those few instances where I have forgotten to make that call.

I ride at 5:30am, with a group, because there is greater safety in numbers – we ride to avoid the traffic, but my solo ride in to meet my group, and solo ride home is always in the middle of peak hour. At 5:30 I face fluro-clad tradies, hell bent on owning the roads. Shortly after, I face the ongong stream of morning commuter traffic – people speeding, weaving, on the phone, not paying attention, angry with the ever increasing traffic, stressed about work, or simply preoccupied with everything they have to do that day. All it takes is one slip of their attention, and regardless of my vigilance, I become little more than a nameless road statistic, and fodder for more anti-cyclist vitriol like yours. In the mean time, my wife and family have to cope with picking up the pieces left behind.

It is true that there are those among us who ride bicycles who don’t always do the right thing, but I don’t see you tarring Brisbane’s drivers with the same brush because of those among them who speed, run red lights, drive on the phone, etc etc etc. For the record, I drive too – so which am I? An untouchable car driver, or an easy victim cyclist?

So the next time you, or your fellow writers take it upon yourselves to level yet another attack at the growing cycle community of Brisbane, think to yourselves what it must have been like for that unnamed cyclist who died this week. Perhaps then, and only then, might you begin to understand what it is to “ride in another’s shoes”, so to speak.

In that, I look forward to better and more responsible journalism in the future – from all of you.

Regards,
Michael

Bookmark and Share

Popularity: 3% [?]

Sharing a dirty word for some pedestrians

Aushiker | February 12, 2010 10:25 am

A letter appeared in this week’s issue (February 13, 2010 Vol 37 No. 7) of the Cambridge Post newspaper from the Pedestrian of Essex Street, Wembley, with the title “Sharing a dirty word for some cyclists.”  I took the opportunity this morning to pen a short reply. That reply is below.

Dear The Editor

I would like if I may, respond to the letter from the "Pedestrian" as published in the Cambridge Post,February 13, 2010 tiled "sharing a dirty word for some cyclists."

The Pedestrian calls for an education campaign for "those others either ignorant or just too selfish to bother warning a pedestrian they are about to be overtaken by a bike."

I would like to add my support for such an education campaign, but can I also please ask, and to use the language of the Pedestrian, that such a campaign also address those others either to ignorant or just to selfish to bother sharing the paths with cyclists appropriately and that such a campaign include the message that it is not appropriate to abuse cyclists, yep abuse cyclists who use their bells appropriately (or call out a friendly warning) and are trying to ride safely.  Is it too much to ask that such a campaign includes walking one’s dog on a lead and controlling those dogs (not having them wandering across the path on long leads); is it too much to ask that pedestrians keep left (or right if preferred and the white line on some paths is neither right or left) and to look before changing direction, entering paths and so on. Is all that too much to ask for?

So you see my point is that both parties need to act responsibility and to share the dual use paths with respect and consideration, just as the Pedestrians expects cyclists to do. Maybe the Pedestrian needs to ride a bicycle for a bit to see both sides of the fence. I know I walk, ride and drive so have a much better understanding from all aspects.

Personally, I prefer to ride on the road and limit my use of dual use paths that are frequented by pedestrians as I find the whole experience far more daunting than riding on the road. At least car drivers tend to be more predictable even though they can easily kill me and sadly some to seem to think that is their choice!

Regards
Andrew Priest

Bookmark and Share

Popularity: 2% [?]

Drop bar bikes = intent to ride without due care apparently

Aushiker | February 6, 2010 6:14 pm

Councillor Rod Bradley of the Town of Cambridge Council is having his say again on cyclists.  This is the same Councillor Bradley who called for the forcing of cyclists to use paths in August, 2008.  Now I respect Councillor Bradley’s right to express his views, however, is it to much to ask Councillor Bradley to actually think about what he is saying? Is it too much to ask Councillor Bradley to engage in discussions in an appropriate manner?   I am really struggling to see how comments such as these as reported in the Post are constructive, appropriate or even show a reasonable level of understanding to warrant actually participating in such a discussion. 

The article where Councillor Bradley is quoted is titled Cyclist flattens lakeside walker and was published in the Cambridge Post February 6, 2010, Vol 37 No. 6 and Councillor Bradley’s comments can be found on page 81 of this issue.

Referring for a moment to the incident as report. My fullest sympathies go out to Ms McAnearney and express my extreme disappointment with this incident and the actions of the cyclist as reported, just as I am extremely disappointed at any incident on our roads and paths where any user is hurt or worst killed, whether it be pedestrian, cyclist or motorised vehicle occupant.

What disappoints me is that I don’t read of Councillor Bradley out “calling for blood” so to speak of motorists who injure or kill cyclists. Sadly I don’t read of Councillor Bradley calling for the ban of motorists (probably stupid anyway) but I don’t see the Councillor calling for action on penalties for motorists injuring or killing cyclists; for major road design changes and so on. I don’t see the Councillor doing any this when a motorist injuries or kills another motorist or passenger.  I therefore must really question Councillor Bradley’s motives and sincerity with his most recent statements.

The statement by Councillor Bradley which caught my interest is this one:

The time is overdue for proper controls to be established over the use of cycles on roads and cycleways…

A machine [bicycle] that requires the rider to bend forward in a way that makes it difficult to see ahead is a prima facie indication of an intent to ride without due care for others or self (my emphasis).

Cycling is promoted as being health and eco-friendly but there is an ominous side to it.

A couple of thoughts on this statement:

  1. Proper controls are in place, they are called the Road Code of Western Australia 2000 as amended. Yep those same laws that control the behaviour of motorists and other road users.  Maybe the real issue is proper enforcement of these road rules by all users Councillor Bradley. How many cyclists killed other users in 2009? How many motorists killed over users in 2009 Councillor Bradley? I really wonder about your priorities.
  2. I wonder if Councillor Bradley knows how to actually ride a bicycle as described (e.g., a drop bar bicycle) given these comments. I average 300 km plus a week on such a bicycle. Apparently I am riding with a prima facie intent to ride without due care for others or myself.  Councillor Bradley, let me make this really clear. That insinuation is offensive and reflects nothing more than your ignorance. You don’t even know me, you don’t even know how I ride, yet you have come to this conclusion. Oh please!
  3. What does this say about the likes of our own Cadel Evans, current road racing World Champion? What does it say about Lance Armstrong and the Livestrong Foundation; What does this say about all those professional cyclists racing in our own Tour de Perth (held by the way in the Town of Cambridge), the Australian Tour Down Under, or the three Grand Tours on the international stage, the Tour de France, Giro d’Italia, and Vuelta a España or the hundreds of other races held around the world at numerous locations throughout the year.

It is really disappointing to see an elected representative expressing views in such an ill-informed manner. It does nothing to enhance informed and proper governance at the local council level.

If you wish to contact Councillor Bradley directly to discuss his views, his email address as published on the Town of Cambridge website is cr.bradley@cambridge.wa.gov.au.

Bookmark and Share

Popularity: 6% [?]

Let respect bridge cyclist-driver gap

Aushiker | January 14, 2010 9:03 pm

Another excellent article on learning to sharing the road together. However, reading the comments posted, it seems some people either have too much time on their hands or some real serious anger management issues or both. That said this is a good message to get out hence I am repeating it here.  The article was posted in the Port Macquarie News.

CYCLISTS are people, too.

Port Macquarie Triathlon Club president Andrew Lister is encouraging residents to look past the Lycra and helmet to consider cyclists as people and treat them accordingly.

“It’s more than likely to be your GP or the waitress that served you last night in a restaurant,” he said.

Mr Lister said respect from both motorists and cyclists was important.

He has thrown his support behind safety campaigns such as the Amy Gillett Foundation’s A Metre Matters.

The catch-cry encourages motorists to allow at least a 1m space when passing cyclists.

“You might be delayed by 10 seconds to get around a cyclist, but it takes a single second to seriously injure or kill someone,” Mr Lister said.

Australian Transport Safety Bureau data shows between 2000 and 2005, the number of cyclist deaths ranged from 26 to 46 a year, or about 2 or 3 per cent of total deaths in road crashes.

Many injuries go unreported.

The Amy Gillett Foundation’s primary objective is to reduce the incidence of injury and death caused by the interaction between cyclists and motorists.

The foundation’s chief executive officer, Tony Fox, said it was important to raise awareness about the need to make extra space around cyclists to ensure safety on the roads.

Mr Lister identified Hastings River Dr, Houston Mitchell Dr and Pacific Dr as cycling black spots.

Cycling has become increasingly popular, competitively and recreationally.

And it is a family pursuit for the Listers. Jack, 10, urged drivers to look out for cyclists.

“If you hurt a cyclist, it also hurts their families as well,” the Tacking Point Public School student said.

Mr Lister acknowledged cyclists also must follow the road rules and motorists needed to consider cyclists, too.

What we need to remember is that cyclist are NOT THE ONLY PEOPLE that break the law sometimes and more importantly when breaking the law in a car, truck or bus you can easily kill someone; it is much harder, if not near impossible for the cyclist to kill the motor vehicle driver or passengers.  So why all this anger over a few seconds and yes it is a few seconds or a paint scratch … so so sad really.

Bookmark and Share

Popularity: 3% [?]